Making your home a fairer, greener, place:  | Home |  News |  Blog |  Forums | 
Friday 03rd of February 2012
Feed

Main Topics:

Green forums:

Archives:

EA plans 80 new wind turbines


by David Masters
November 26, 2008
Fairtrade

The Environment Agency this week unveiled plans to build up to 80 wind turbines in EA-owned locations across the UK.

EA Chairman, Lord Chris Smith, told delegates at the Agency’s annual conference that 80 new wind turbines could provide enough electricity for 90,000 homes - equivalent to the number of houses in a city the size of York.

The money made selling electricity from the turbines would bring in £2.4 million extra funding for the government each year, money which could be used to do extra work to help the environment.

Smith also urged public sector bodies to follow the EA’s example and start putting renewable energy technologies on their land.

In total, the Government owns 10% of the UK’s land, and Smith believes that putting all this land to good use producing renewable energy would go a long way towards helping the UK meet its carbon emissions reduction targets.

Critics of the planned turbines have warned that the wind powered generators are likely to be placed in some of the UK’s most picturesque locations.

Sites for the turbines - which are all to be built on EA owned land - include the River Thames, the River Medway, and the Fens, one of the best bird watching locations in the UK.

In addition Professor David MacKay from Cambridge University has said that wind power is relatively ineffective.

According to MacKay, if wind turbines were built to cover an area the size of Wales, they would still only provide enough power for one sixth of the UK’s energy needs.


Discuss this in the Fair Home Forums



Related posts to "EA plans 80 new wind turbines":




1 Comment »
  1. The article says: “In addition Professor David MacKay from Cambridge University has said that wind power is relatively ineffective.”

    In fact, I didn’t say this. Wind power is not ineffective. It does work, and it’s not a waste of money (though it is a bit more expensive than fossil fuels). It just requires large areas to be covered by wind farms to make a difference.

    The second statement “if wind turbines were built to cover an area the size of Wales, they would provide enough power for one sixth of the UK’s energy needs.” is correct.

    http://www.withouthotair.com

    Comment by David MacKay — November 27, 2008 @ 12:36 am

Leave a comment


Previous: « Mercedes-Benz unveils eco-car
Next: Mayor Johnson’s metamorphism into eco-warrior »

Visited 1993 times, 2 so far today