Making your home a fairer, greener, place:  | Home |  News |  Blog |  Forums | 
Sunday 19th of May 2013
Feed

Main Topics:

Green forums:

Archives:

UN, Humans Causing Ice Caps to Melt


by Alan Harten
October 31, 2008
Environment

With funding from the UN’s climate change body, sciences have been plugging holes in present scientific knowledge regarding the variations in temperature at both the Arctic and Antarctic poles.

The team of researchers made multiple temperature measurements in many polar areas. They then fed their results into two very different computer simulated climate models.

One set of climate models assumed that there were no people on the planet and therefore no human affect on temperature changes.

The other set of models took into account the effect of human influence both in the northern Arctic region and the southern Antarctic.

After much number crunching a new model has emerged that shows large differences between the no people, and people models.

The results indicate clearly that human beings are having a significant influence on the melting of the ice caps.

The model that showed the effects of human interaction on the planet, allowing for the burning of fossil fuels and other human only activity, was a very close match with the group’s figures regarding temperature fluctuations.

It is fair to point out that the results were most clearly indicated in the Arctic region where there have been large amounts of evidence that, in particular, summer sea ice is melting at a more rapid pace than ever before.

The result indicates that there is at least some significant effect in the Antarctic as a result of human activity which is bringing about an increase in ice melting on the southern polar cap.


Discuss this in the Fair Home Forums



Related posts to "UN, Humans Causing Ice Caps to Melt":




3 Comments »
  1. But surely, if the human model begins with the assumption that humans are, in fact, making the planet warmer, the ice caps would necessarily be larger in the non-human model? Do we, in fact, have an adequate understanding of the factors that effect global climate to generate an accurate model? Do the models take into effect naturally occurring circumstances, such as forest fires, which would continue unstoppably without human intervention? Furthermore, how can we refer to ice caps as “melting” when there is, in fact, more ice there this year, than there was last year? Clearly, this is some strange usage of the word “melting” that I wasn’t previously aware of.

    Comment by VanGarrett — October 31, 2008 @ 4:45 pm

  2. I think that is a very good point, the information I have available does not make it clear if the “plus humans” model assumes melting or if the human effects are added into the mix to produce melting.

    It is also true that there seem to be hundreds of scientific teams producing conflicting reports about melting ice on a seemingly weekly basis.

    Comment by Alan Harten — November 4, 2008 @ 3:19 am

  3. We need 2 sort this out quick other wise it will rise and we will die!! RE-CYCLE USE UN LEEDED PETROL DO WHAT YOU CAN!!

    Comment by Tegan — November 24, 2008 @ 8:13 pm

Leave a comment


Previous: «
Next: »

Visited 4574 times, 1 so far today