London freesheet recycling scheme falls short of targets
by Grant Draper
July 21, 2008
Earlier this year an impressive agreement was signed between two big publishers and the city council, London Lite and the London Paper and Westminster council, which would see a dramatic increase in paper recycling within the area.
The Freesheet recycling scheme was born, with an aim to recycle 400 tonnes of newspaper per year.
Now, over the half way point, the bins allocated to help the scheme have achieved impressive figures of 120 tonnes, which is a stupidly high amount, and the equivelent of 1,920 trees, but still, short of the 400 tonnes per annum figure target.
London Lite and Metro publisher Associated Newspapers and News International, owner of the London Paper, all chipped in to provide the bins.
During a 6 month period, a shocking 465 tonnes of paper from 153 key positioned bins we’re recycled.
Figures show that well over £1.5 million free newspapers are distributed throughout London alone, every day, and by implicating a scheme such as the freesheet recycling scheme, nationwide, could have a huge impact on the volume of recycling that takes place, not to mention the recycling awareness that the scheme would create.
Discuss this in the Fair Home Forums
Add to Bookmarks:
Related posts to "London freesheet recycling scheme falls short of targets":
- London considers compulsory recycling ...
- New Zealand joins world recycling elite ...
- 74% of packaging to be recovered by 2010 ...
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
Previous: « Channel 4 mislead viewers with climate change documentary
Next: Scientists say wetlands being destroyed across the globe »
Visited 237 times, 1 so far today
“..120 tonnes, which is a stupidly high amount..”
not sure about that Grant.
The publishers are responsible for producing approx 100 tonnes every day; so to be capturing and recycling just 4% of the daily production level is plain unacceptable in my book
Comment by Justin Canning — July 21, 2008 @ 7:39 pm
“..120 tonnes, which is a stupidly high amount..”
I agree it’s a shocking figure but underlines just how much we’re wasting and why we need to get on top of it.
Comment by vNim — July 22, 2008 @ 1:39 pm